Pinner Park Farm

On 27 November Harrow Council published a report by Bidwells on the first consultation on the future of Pinner Park Farm which was undertaken last spring. See the link below. Having considered the report carefully, the Council has asked Bidwells to work on a proposal to create an open country park similar to one at Greenwich. The proposal will also allow the Council to restore and protect historic buildings on the site but, it would appear, will involve new housing on this Green Belt site.


The Hatch End Association have no objection in principle to greater access on foot or cycle by members of the public to the green belt/open space at Pinner Park Farm, insofar as it is practicable within the arrangements of a working farm. But we cannot support the two options in the Future of PPF Public Consultation Summer 2014.

No reason for or explanation of the termination of the present activity is given, such as inadequate operation of the farm, a drain on the Council’s finances, or an inability to find other ways to maintain the listed buildings. That such maintenance might emerge as a by-product of the proposed options is not a justification for them. In any event, whether all of the listed buildings are worth artificial reconstruction in view of their decrepit condition is arguable.

The consultation paper’s attempt to influence support for a country park by showing attractive illustrations of Hylands Park at Chelmsford is grossly misleading. That park spreads over 570 acres, compared with the 230 at Pinner. It is based on what was a substantial 18th century private estate with a significant mansion. Twenty years of investment have created a large area of landscaped parkland, with formal gardens, etc, as well as a year-round leisure and entertainment venue and a sports and events programme up to and including a weekend rock festival (tickets up to £100).

It might be premature for the Harrow/Bidwells schemes to attempt detailed business plans for their two options. But councillors and public are expected to take on trust the underlying assumption that either option would yield initial and continuing receipts which would cover the costs of the immediate redevelopment and the continuing management and maintenance of the site in perpetuity. There is no clue as to the price range of the residential units which would provide the starting finances; no clue as to potential labour costs; and not even the broadest indication of what kind of numbers of visitors and vehicles are envisaged.

There are other points about the options which will be of concern. These range from the scattering of parking places around the perimeter to the nature of the miscellaneous activities envisaged. Among the most important are the appearance and environmental aspects of the central housing units, which would be no more appealing – gated or not – than present structures in the middle of the green belt (leave aside how the residents might react to the visitors, school parties, etc that  would be rambling around the perimeter of their properties). Traffic and transport to and from the site are among other issues.

We understand that consideration may be given to the re-designation of the area from green belt to metropolitan open land. This is a potential worry as in recent years the loss of land (mainly to housing) from MOL has been markedly greater than that affecting green belt (CPRE London Member Briefing, 2014).

4 thoughts on “Pinner Park Farm

  1. liz parry

    I HAVE ALSO WRITTEN TO Cllrs. Lammiman;-Bond and G.Weston,the local paper,Pinner Assoc,. and Headstone Residents assoc. and last,. not least Nick Hurd.MP-we have such limited tinme and so much to lose.THANKS FOR YOUR HELP.Tell those who can also register their support.

  2. James Gleeson

    I’m in total agreement with the above appraisal and have submitted a response on the Harrow Council website (Consultation Comments) to that effect. My wife and I have lived in Hatch End for eighteen years. For the last three or four years I’ve noticed a general shift in the ‘attitude’ of various council employees (and even departments)
    Harrow council recently wrote to me advising of a planning application for an ‘eruv’. The council effectively advising us they’re planning to donate parts of the public pathway in Park View to a private company (The company is working on behalf of a special interest group.) The upshot is the private company wish to install a 25 or 30 foot steel pole almost directly outside my front door for ‘religious reasons’ I’ve lodged a formal objection to the planning application on the grounds the pole (and wires) would impede the movement of fire fighting equipment. The Fire Service have advised that (from an operational perspective) the less street furniture in any given road the more effective their service.
    Frankly, the job the council is currently doing generally is lamentable.
    The council is failing the residents of Hatch End, seemingly unable to deliver basic services like refuse collection and repairing potholes. Meanwhile other ‘Development’ departments appoint ‘managers’ with high flying titles, that at the end of the day, seem to be doing little more than making a nuisance of themselves.

  3. Douglas Milsom

    My wife and I attended the well presented display at the Harrow Arts Centre regarding the proposals for a Country Park at the site of Pinner Park Farm. From the display, we naturally assumed that the current tenants were not continuing as farmers there, and we both voted to support the proposal for a Country Park with minimal housing development, as the lesser of two evils.

    Since then, we were surprised to learn that the tenant farmers, Michael and John O’Hara, wish to continue farming there. We feel that the Council were disingenuous in hiding this fact at the display.

    We strongly support the continued use of this land as a farm, with the current level of access.

  4. vlvien wichei

    Pinner is considered the nicest place to live in the Harrow borough and certainly house prices would confirm desirability. It is the mix of farm land, houses with reasonable sized gardens, parks and thriving little shopping areas. Pinner Park farm is precious to that environment. Pinner is under the threat of being ruined like the rest of Harrow. Thoughtless planning, land grabbing, ‘selling off the family silver’ once it has gone its gone! I am sure most people of Pinner would hate to see this urban farm go.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *